Phương pháp lựa chọn mô hình đóng cửa cho các mỏ khai thác đá xây dựng tại tỉnh Bình Dương
- Authors: Phan Hong Viet 1, Do Ngoc Tuoc 2
Affiliations:
1 Binh Duong Department of Industry and Trade
2 Vinacomin Institute of Mining Science and Technology
- *Corresponding:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
- Received: 10th-Aug-2020
- Revised: 25th-June-2020
- Accepted: 10th-Aug-2020
- Online: 30th-Aug-2020
- Section: Mining
Abstract:
Typically, construction material quarries are exploited below tlie self-flowing drainage ; level. At the end of exploitation, it will create i spaces that contain surface water and ; groundwater. Depending on factors such as j topography, geology, and local planning, closure and use patterns nnay be considered: aquaculture lakes, amusement parks, reservoirs and storage yards, waste,,, The effective consideration of technical, environmental, economic and social criteria has been identified as an important basis for the optimal selection of the identified closure model. Using the analysis hierarchical process (AHP) and the method of organization of priority ranking (PROMETHEE) to evaluate shows that the aquaculture model chosen is most suitable for construction quarries in Binh Du’ong province.
1. Nguyễn Đức Quý, Nguyễn Vãn Hạnh. (2012). Đóng cửa mỏ vả hoàn phục môi trường. Hội Tuyển khoáng Việt Nam.
2. Bascetin, A. (2007). A decision support system using analytical liierarchy process for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine, Environ. Geo!., 52(4), 663-672.
3. Brodie M.J., Robertson A. M., & Gadsby J. W. (1992). Cost effective closure plan management for metal mines. http://www.robertsongeoconsultants. com/papers/metal mines.pdf. Accessed April 2015
4. Coppin N.J., & Box J. (1999). Sustainable rehabilitation and revegetation: The identification of after-use options for mines and quarries using a land suitability classification involving nature conservation, In A. Warhurst, & L. Moronha (eds.). Environmental policy in mining: corporate strategy and planning for closure (Chap. 12, pp. 57-75). New York, Lewis Publishers.
5. De Montis A., De Toro P., Droste-Franke B., Omamm I., & StagI S, (2000). Criteria for quality assessment of MCDA Methods”. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, 21-27.
6. Heikkinen P.M., Noras P., Salminen, R. Mroueh, GTK U.-M., Vahanne, P.,... Komppa, V. (2008). Mine closure handbook (pp. 21-25). Finland: Geological Society of Finland.
7. Laurence Turcksina,*, Annalia Bernardinia. (2011). Cathy MacharisaA combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 20. 954-965.
8. Mougeot L.J.A. (2002). Breaking new ground: Mining, minerals, and sustainable development: The report of the MMSD Project, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 441 pp.
9. Warhust A., & Noronha, L. (2000). Corporate strategy and viable future land use: Planning for closure from the outset of mining, Natural Resources Forum, 24, 153-164.
Other articles
Mining Industry Journal
No. 226 Le Duan Street, Dong Da District, Hanoi City
Tel:(+84-24) 36649158 Fax: (+84-24) 366159
Email:tccongnghiepmo@gmail.com